Federal High Court in Lagos struck out an interim order of forfeiture obtained by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) which sought to seize 14 properties allegedly linked to Governor Yahaya Bello of Kogi State. Justice Nicholas Oweibo struck out the suit on the ground that Section 308 of the 1999 Constitution prevents the institution of any criminal or civil case against a sitting governor or the President.The judge had earlier granted an interim forfeiture order on February 22, following an ex parte motion filed by the anti-graft agency seeking to seize 14 properties located in Lagos, Abuja, and the United Arab Emirates (UAE).
The Court had also directed EFCC to make publication in two national dailies for any interested parties to show cause why the order should not be made absolute.However, Governor Bello filed a Notice of Intention to oppose and an application seeking the vacation of the interim forfeiture order. The Governor argued that the property listed were not proceeds of an unlawful act, as they were acquired long before he was elected as Kogi State Governor and could not have been acquired from Kogi State funds. Governor Bello further argued that the EFCC is prevented by Section 308 of the Constitution from instituting any civil or criminal suit against him. He protested the illegality in the filing of the suit by the EFCC, noting that the case was in disobedience to a State High Court order, which restrained the EFCC from investigating any account of the Kogi State Government pending the determination of the Motion on Notice. He stated that the interim forfeiture order was obtained by suppression or misrepresentation of facts by the Commission.
The Governor also said the Proceeds of Crime Act could not take effect in retrospect as the properties in dispute were acquired before he became Kogi State Governor. He said the validity of the Proceeds of Crime Act, 2022 was being challenged at the Supreme Court.Regarding jurisdiction, Governor Bello argued that the properties listed were in Abuja, Kogi, and UAE, and the personality involved is based in Lokoja. He added that the suit ought to have been instituted either in Abuja or in Kogi State. He, therefore, asked the court to vacate the case for lack of jurisdiction.In response, EFCCs lawyer Rotimi Oyedepo (SAN), said the applicant had brought nothing before the court to convince it to vacate the order. He said, contrary to the submissions of the Applicant, Kogi State High Court or any other court in Nigeria had not stopped the EFCC from carrying out its constitutional duties.
